Letter to the Editor, Newsday
“Banning kids from AI isn’t the answer”
As published
Abby McCloskey asserts that “The only way to address those worries [about the dangers of AI] is not to toggle with the app, but to limit kids’ exposure to it entirely” [“Only one way to make LI safe for kids,” Opinion, Aug. 30].
As the founder of an educational consulting company, I believe this all-or-nothing, head-in-the-sand approach is, at best, a well-intentioned but misguided short-term solution to a long-term situation that has no clear, foreseeable resolution. There are certainly well-documented dangers to inappropriately using AI as a substitute friend, confidant, or therapist. Research on the effect of AI use on a growing mind is still unfolding.
Considering the impact of AI on children requires a nuanced approach that takes into account numerous factors such as the child’s age, whether there is adult involvement and supervision, the purpose of the interaction, the degree of AI literacy education the child has received, and what guardrails can help guide responsible, ethical, and effective use.
It’s time for the adults in children’s lives — in particular, parents and teachers — to own this responsibility. This shut-it-down approach will not help the children already using AI nor will it prepare them for the world of ubiquitous technology that exists today.
Ivy Leibowitz — Founder of Word Spring, an educational consulting firm dedicated to teaching students to harness AI in their thinking and writing. She is a lifelong educator; former English teacher at a NYC independent school, public schools, and law school; former school board member; and attorney.